*The MindCode Consortium* "Given that computer code is used to program computers, then MindCode ..." 1. Executive Summary 2. Technical Program Description 1. Objectives 2. Background 3. Text - executive summary 1. 1. This proposal advocates the establishment of a major R&D "Program" to develop the understanding and tools required to diagnose (or read, analyze, decode) an individual's mind-related DNA (or thought programs - both ingrained and evolved), and to reprogram or to change that DNA programming. This proposal has been prepared in terms of a program consisting of several phases and major sub-projects that will occur over a very long period of time and in co-operation with global institutions and initiatives outside of the MindCode consortium. There are obvious benefits of initiating a well-administered and directed program involving a smaller number of institutions that have the expertise and resources as well as external organizations that may have commercial interests in the resultant technology. It is important to maintain a strong focus and to avoid dissipation of effort over too large a field of activity. Another important issue for participants will be the treatment of intellectual property, which must be balanced against the need for publication and sharing of information with the other R&D programs worldwide. This program plan has a duration of five years and a total budget of 25 million dollars*. * 1. Draft Scope 1. Text - what will and will not be pursued, focus 1. Note that the projects listed below would FIRST assess what is already available and what is under development, as almost all work will be sourced from outside of the program. Where gaps exist, and things must be brought together, then the MindCode program will be active. 1. the approach 2. simple life-forms - establishing the first linkages between code and neural structures 3. human brain - trying to associate general regions of DNA with brain structure through genetic damage etc 4. comparison of brain coding to protein coding 5. human brain - attempts to correlate very simple brain structures to DNA coding 1. Structure and Process of the Consortium 1. Basic Principles 2. Program Management 1. Distributed Program Management - the role of JAVA and CORBA 3. Commercialization Issues 1. Linux Arrangement 2. Human Genome project 3. Publishing & Copyright 4. Intellectual Property 5. Standards 6. Marketing 4. Human Resource Development Issues 2. Key Potential Participants 1. Funding 2. Program Management 3. Technology Development 4. Technology Transfer 3. Initiation of the Consortium 4. Termination of the Consortium 5. Conclusions 1. Text - conclusions to the paper 1. 1. An open, cooperative approach is suggested for the MindCode consortium that would involve many individuals and institutions using special program management capabilities over the Internet to cooperate on a study of DNA coding related to brain structure and functioning. While many individuals in this cooperative effort might be hobbyists or amateurs, they still may contribute very significant progress as was the case with Linux, the operating system. Obviously, at some point in time a substantive amount of institutional or organizational investment would be required for true progress. Institutional involvement will be a very important component for guaranteeing long-term progress, and an umbrella organization would be helpful and perhaps essential for the development of the MindCode consortium. For now, a substantial amount of input and cooperation is needed to help elaborate on the initial scoping of the MindCode consortium, and to flush out and feel out appropriate and priority areas of development. People are needed to tackle the definition of objectives and to define the scope of the program. Moreover, some considerable effort will be required for planning, financing, and managing the development of the MindCode consortium and to bring in new members. Please contact the author if you are interested in becoming involved in this consortium. What are the advantages of the proposed format for the MindCode consortium? The main issue at this point in time is to stimulate interest and activity in this area, and encourage a broad range of technology thrusts that will be required for MindCode as a whole to progress. Networking, early awareness of work that is going on, sharing of resources and distribution of pertinent information, reduction/distribution of risks, facilitation of funding and program management, and mutual support for a focussed effort are key advantages. Against that must be balanced a reduced control over Intellectual Property, and the danger of losing focus and that the umbrella organization doesn't bring added value to Participants beyond the normal manner of operation in the research community.