Steve msg.txt www.BillHowell.ca 17Mar2021 initial Here are comments to your recent series of texts, in lines prefaced by ">> ". I've added a feww links here and there, but I haven't tried to be more complete. I will send a separate email on Sacha Dobler's "Solar behaviour" book, sequel to his awesome "Solar story" book (maybve in a few days - remind me if I forget). He runs with scientific papers suggesting huge links to [history, stock markets, human [behaviour, health, mood, etc, etc]. It's mind-bg even iff I've been tracking this for almost 20 years, and spookiy, astrology comes up big time (he de-emphasises this at present), as it keeps doing in my analysis and communications. Up until ~300 years ago, astronomy and astrology were inseparable in acivilisations. Perhaps now the ancient truths are coming back? I don't like astrology, but I'm worng more than r And why do they alwaaysk for our birth dates - it it only because of it being a great indicator of stage-of-lfe and beahviour (bst reason, presumably) or are many organisations tracking people with respect to astrology? It's really important to run with inspirations and think through things, and you have done a great job. No sense in being embarrassed by anything, as you have to kiss a lot off gs to find a prince. Besides, it's great fun. When I really get excited, I can't even write down things at the spur of the moment, but wait until I settle down in hours or day and (hopefully) capture some of it. I am stuff in the "grab a formula and do the modelling" mindset, but more and more I appreciate that real insights come from those who DON'T do that. Modelling and science is a derivative, experiment is far more important than theory. Note that the implications don't to have a "container", they spill into almost everything... My Thunderbird email program is "constipated" right now and can't downlad, so I have to use webMail and the formatting is text-only. +-----+ This article is dated last october and lists oncolytics first in 100 billion per year increase expected in immune therapy sales in the near future. If they get a small percentage of that number is a pretty awesome deal https://www.theglobeandmail.com/investing/markets/stocks/ONCY-Q/pressreleases/399520/ Bill : Thanks Steve. I will look tomorrow. Just trying to finish my last peer review for ijcnn conference today. Tomorrow is deadline. +-----+ Bill I had an idea and sent you a picture of a galaxy top-down to illustrate. The pictures all show two vanes extending out from the centre. I'm wondering about relation between geologic eras and this picture. If it takes 240 million years for our solar system wouldn't we be passing through four magnetic poles in that period? Would these time with the geologic eras? Also would there might be some sort of attenuation of the magnetics to explain other timings like 12,000 years etc? For solar system to circle the center >>+--+ >> Tons of literature on that, of which I will mention 2 authors. I have the references : >> Yan Veizer, was emeritus Uof Ottawa (met severall s) - Yan is what I call the "killer whale of climate science" (Tim Patterson also notable, Paul Vaughan of Vancouver world's best [solar, climate] modeller of last 150 years). Shaviv & Veizer 2004 - CO2 as a primary driver of Phanerozoic climate http://www.gsajournals.org/pdf/online_forum/i1052-5173-14-3-e4.pdf Scherer, Veizer, Shaviv et.al. 2006 "Interstellar-Terrestrial relations: variable cosmic environments, the dynamic heliosphere, and their imprints on terrestrial archives and climate" Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, 2006 ~163pp. Space Science Reviews 127/1-4, 327-465. >> Steve Wickson - [born, raised] in Gleichen, met while at UofCalgary via Friends of Science, did Masters (and PhD?) at Uof Ottawaa) Steven Wickson "Galactic influences over the last 65 million years" presentation to a Uof Calgary Astrophysics class, ?2006? Steven Wickson "The solar system's motion in the galactic tidal field" Uof Calgary Astrophysics course 599, Final Report 19Jan06 Steven Wickson, 04Jul07 "A Galactic Theory of Climate" http://www.billhowell.ca/Wickson website/Wickson - Galactic Theory of Climate.pdf http://www.billhowell.ca/Wickson%20website/Steven%20Wickson.html +-----+ The infinite universe is an infinite machine of well oiled cogs spinning/reversing in harmony. Timing of each reversal increases as you broaden out from our solar system to star clusters, galaxy clusters, galaxy system clusters and so on. Everything working in perfect harmony. You can learn a lot from our geologic history and understanding of the solar system and extrapolate that out to characterize our galaxy and so on and what magnetics look like and how that might affect us. Also filaments between stars must be from plasma flashes. Which would tie to changes in magnetism. Meaning magnetic reversals above. >> EU types speak of [often, usually?] continuous current flowing in Birkland currents at all scales [planets <-> sun <-> stars <-> star clusters <-> regions <-> galaxies <-> galaxy clusters <-> etc. It also scales down, some going subatomic. Furthermore, plasma physics scales across many orders of magnituede (eg SAFIRE electric experiment to test electric sun theory). The besty expression of this is Glenn Borchardt's "law of infinity" - things just extend, so don't shut down your thinking at proximal boundaries of scale. Borchardt co-authored a book with Stephen Peutz, who extended cycles like that (insanely similar and more powerful than the Mayans?). >> the geology, paleontology, etc links have been discussed by many - without geology, you have difficulty extending. I'm guessing numbers of magnetic poles doubles each time you broaden out. >> ??? Not sure - some spiral galaxies have >2 spirals, spherical galaxies are mostly spreical without spirals, other odd shapes too. >> If you are speaking of current sheet spirals, these tend to look like they "bunch up" with radial distance. >> Here's one of my fun brain farts - The ridiculous dark [matter, energy] theme arose as a desperate attempt to save General Relativity (GR), but it actually refutes GR if you think about it. It's nice to be creative, but not when the whole communities become rligious disciples and priests of it, and MASSIVE mis-allocations of funding result. Ben Davidson has closely followed the failures of junk dark theories, and suggests that [dust, plasma] are a much better pursuit. Howeverone of the Veizer papers above points out the relative motion of stars with respect to the spiral arms of galaxies, and assuminthat is correct, it provides a MUCH simpler explanation famous inconsistency of star velocities with respect to radial distance from the galactic centers. Here's my simple video animation (not correct physics, but doable animation for me) : http://www.billhowell.ca/Bill%20Howells%20videos/Birkeland%20rotation%20in%20galaxy%20-%20not%20dark%20matter/Birkeland%20rotation%20in%20galaxy%20-%20not%20dark%20matter.html +-----+ Are star on axis of the galaxy brightest? Or where would the greatest magnetic changes occur in galaxy or is that ever changing. I've been smoking pot so that's my excuse >> See my opening comments about the [electric, plasma] universe viewpoits. Magnetism is purely a function of charged particles, typically as a current (current understanding is that this applies to permanent magnets as well, but I don't commit : multiple conflicting hypothesis - don't throw away intereisting thinking, it may come back...). >> I don't know. Apparent brightness is a strong function of proximity to Earth (for us). I think that there are correction factors for distance, and beyond parallax (which only goes out a limited distance) redshift is kind of the only metric, and it is far from perfect (Halton Arp - big problems). >> The axis of the galaxy is perpendicuar to the plane of the galaxy, where most starts are found. There are important ?plasma? bubbes on the axis. In Electric Universe (EU) theory, a galaxy is a z-pinch phenomena (also stars, SAFIRE I think referes to this as well), with current coming up out of the poles and returning via the current sheet. This is being monitored for the sun, but there are no satellites out in the axis. +-----+ Maybe galaxies with a black hole are hung on a larger sphere of similar galaxies which are being siphoned along magnetic lines to or away from the the black hole which may itself be other denser layers of star systems. Omg i know it's getting bad. L Ron Hubbard here I come >> I am NOT a fan of black holes at all : "General Relativity (GR)is a turkey, quantum mechanics is a fool's paradise". If I had to bet money over the long-term assuming an [impartial, honest, competent, thinking] judge, I say that their basis is crap, as is General Relativity (GR) itself, and quantum mechanics (QM). From "out of the mainstream" scientists like Bill Lucas (Universal Force) and Randell Mills (hydrino - more specifically a far superior classical science basis to completely throw out QM) GR&QM are entirely derivable by classial natural philosophy from the 19th century (1800s), with some modernisations. >> In the end, perhaps QM&GR will prove themselves (not likely in my view), but that will never excuse the massive fraud and stupidity along the way. "turdc thinking" - Screaminly [dishonest, dysfunctional, delinquent, hypocr, backstabbing, parasitic, lay] - at least one, likely more than one, and they are all the same from a third partyoint of view. This is characteristic of modern [science[,tists] - the rule ratherthe exception, and part of the process of science (fashions -> cults -> religions). In essence, science makes the same claim of holding the truth in the same way as [mythology, religion, etc]. >> For a fun alternative to dark [energy, matter] (a BIG farce, stupid science so far) see my animation of the spiral light-up of stars in a galaxy in my web video part of my website. Hint - the sprials move at a different speed than the stars in them? In other words, lighting up light bulbs. Also - could that explain "second stars" in solar system (EU guys on mythology side). Eg, [Jupiter, Saturn] become second sumns temporarily - could be just a branchoff Birkeland current of our Sun's main z-pinch. +-----+ From our understanding of our earth and solar system, from the magnetic reversal history of our sun and earth and limited observation of blah blah blah we can infer quite a bit about characteristics of larger system our sun and galaxy are contained within. >> If you take an Electric Universe context, you have a basis for speculating about this. You can also actually do expeiments in the lab (eg Kritian Birkeland and SAFIRE) >> Conventional astronomy is gravity-centric almost entirely (Electric Universe (EU) emphasizes this, with good reasons). So everything is a surprise and needs a new theory. +-----+ Another thought. Plasma flashes just on a planet are more frequent then inter planet flashes which are more frequent then inter solar which is more frequent then galaxy, universe and multiverse. Timing of when shit happens on galaxy is every 60 million years. Timing much longer on universe. >> [Glenn Borchardt & Stephen Puetz, Randell Mills, Bill Lucas, the EU people (including mythologists!!), etc] all speak of this, and many model it. - Stephen J. Puetz, Glenn Borchardt 2011 "Universal Cycle Theory : Neomechanics of the hierarchically infinite universe" http://www.OutskirtsPress.com ISBN: 978-1-4327-8133-0 http://www.amazon.com/dp/1432781332 - Stephen J. Puetz 2009 "The Unified Cycle Theory: How cycles dominate the structure of the universe and influence life on Earth" http://www.OutskirtsPress.com Denver Colorado USA, ISBN: 978-1-4327-1216-7 http://www.amazon.com/dp/1432712160 http://www.uct-news.com/ +-----+ Again plasma flashes relate to filaments between stars which purely contains cushion material >> cushion material? dust, plasma, dark (non-illuminated) planets & stars, etc, etc, etc >> Again, [electric, plasma] universe have electrical currents. By the way, there are many photos of strings of star formation along plasma filaments (or that appears so), as forecast by EU types decades ago!! +-----+ It may not ever end. Still stoned. Shit lost thought. The sun magnetic pole should shift at half frequency of earth. And star system half frequency of our suns magnetic pole reversal and galaxy at half the star system? >> Sun's pole reverses every sunspot half-cyckle (11.1 year average, but 8-14 year spread). Earth magnetic pole excursions, and flips, much less frequent (chart on my kitchen wall over last 570 My). >> Many are VERY critical of Big Bang thinking! +-----+ Holy fuck don't laugh at me for the rest of my life. Mars is a blueberry a product of fushion expunged from the sun, and mars itself has blueberries on it. I'll send article. Remember the aureon video magnifying the fushion blueberry on the ball surface? It looks exactly like the canals on mars. >> Electric discharge blueberries were reproduced in people's garages when NASA & all scientists claim this absolutely meant water and potential for life. Everybody laughed like shit except university [professor, student]s who had no fucking idea what that meant. +-----+ Shit happens on earth maybe everytime magnetic poles switch on the sun, earth or any other planets . Not sure if all these reversals contribute to the multiple cycle frequencies of when shit happens on earth. >> no to Earth geoMag switch every solarMag switch - sun is every 11 years. >ven small solar effects are being manifested on Earth, at much less than a geoMag swith levelbut [weather, climate, e, etc]. >> Estimating harmonics & interferences is quite interesting, and in my experience the number of people in the world who do it well you could cound on one or two hands. At planetary scale, if they don't mention the difference between synodic and sidereal, then they aren't being thorough ... +-----+ If sun gets congested with debree as passing through galatic magnetic line and a micro nova occurs then many planetary size objects emitted but only mars remains from unique interact between sun debris passing by both magnetic and newtonian forces. >> ??? You should try this shit and give me some material to hang on you >> Hmm, I have enough problems with my mind already. When you, time to experiment, when old - trying to get rid of bad habits. +-----+ Given energy is conserved as earths magnetic poles move and become weaker, where does the magnetic energy loss go to? Creating electricity? If you answer yes, where should we be living? >> Electricity creates magnetism is better way to start. But that magnetism creates electricity under certain conditions, and so on. One of the classical approaches to deriving relativistic correction factor uses this. >> Ben Davidosn jokingly suggests that Jeff Bezos's [apce prot, underground cavern] ?in Arisona or New Mexico] is in an ideal location. Take hints from history - people have already done this? Croatian pymid mountains, Scottish stone mounds, Egyptian pyramids etc etc etc. >> Dad & I - study of last 7,500 years of [rise, fall] of civilisations : http://www.billhowell.ca/Galactic%20rays%20and%20evolution/_Galactic%20rays%20and%20evolution%20-%20life,%20the%20mind,%20civilisation,%20economics,%20financial%20markets.html >> But Sacha Dobler does very inspiring study of last 800 years. +-----+ Is cyprus hills an area plasma arced from and kept the area free of ice from time to time during the ice age. Volcanic material there and devitrified glass >> I'm on the fence - looks more like mountain formation, but there are some that claim mountains formed that way (other processes as well). But maybe there are coulees, but hard to see from stelite photos I looed at. Not conviced from driving through Eastern part of Cypress Hissl to get to Val Marie. >> You are in luck - I posted US Army research chemist Paul Anderson's paper on my website, and I think I showed Cypress Hills along with coulees elsewhere in Alberta. Anderson was a core team member of SAFIRE. http://www.billhowell.ca/Electric%20Universe/Anderson%20-%20Electric%20scarring/Howell%20120903%20Paul%20Anderson's%20Electric%20scarring%20of%20the%20Earth.pdf http://www.billhowell.ca/Electric%20Universe/Anderson%20120825%20Electric%20scarring%20of%20the%20Earth/Anderson%20120725%20Electric%20scarring%20of%20the%20Earth's%20surface%20-%20annotated%20&%20scanned.pdf http://www.billhowell.ca/Electric%20Universe/Anderson%20120825%20Electric%20scarring%20of%20the%20Earth/Howell%20-%20Cypres%20Hills,%20AB,%20Canada%20eye%20alt%2060%20km.JPG >> see also my web directories : http://www.billhowell.ca/Electric%20Universe/Anderson%20-%20Electric%20scarring/ http://www.billhowell.ca/Electric%20Universe/Anderson%20120825%20Electric%20scarring%20of%20the%20Earth/ >> Petroglyph theory inspired by a magical meeting between David Talbot (Electric Universe (EU)) and Anthony Peratt (Lawrence Livermore thermonuclear research). (Quite the story about a meeting!) http://www.billhowell.ca/Electric%20Universe/Peratt%20-%20Auroral%20phenomena%20and%20petroglyphs.html +-----+ If earths magnetic poles are weakening does that mean the inner core is slowing down? If the inner core either slows down or speeds up I imagine the acceleration and changes would upset electrical and newtonian balances and generate electricity too. If earths rotation stopped then getting pounded by sun an cosmic Ray's are sure to recharge the battery so to speak. Lots of reasons for generating plasma >> I am very interested in this theme as perhaps explaining [planet, star, galaxy] cart [rotation rates, orbit]s and especially disruptions thereof. Please note that conventional models of planetary orbits based on gravity also predict rare planet ejections from star systems (Ken Tapping of NR Penticton had modelled this, and first pointed it out to me). Remeber, plas scales up and down enormously, much better than gravity. +-----+ The suns tilted rotation causes the electric current sheet and its frequency of 28 days. I guess the earth would generate a current sheet too although very very weak. >> Very interesting thought, and not one that has occurred to me. Quite possibly, although I haven't seen anything on that, perhaps because of the dominance of the Sun, andlack of searching. [Jupiter, Saturn] are a different story, and there is monitoring of electric currents for their moon systems, but again I don't remember mention of current sheets. However, in the light of their potential occasional "light-up as second Suns" (from EU, and mythology where this IS stated) one would expect that. Not sure galaxy would have same current sheet unless rotation of the galaxy center is tilted? Actually it would because drift occurring between outer stars and inner stars as they rotate around galaxy core and spread outward. >> Tilted with respect to what? - here you are assuming extra-gac super-cluster or local galaxy environment, which is not a bad assumption. +-----+ So the stars towards the galaxy center rotating around the galaxy on average 4 times faster than our solar system is what's creating the current sheet wave of 60 million years consistent with geologic eras? >> I don't know and don't rmember anything. Would have to look at many current models. Velocities of stars closest galaxy center fast and point source. Stars nearest our sun rotating same speed so no generation of magnetism there. So may be a Goldie liz thing going on >> Be careful about assuming constant local star positions with respect to the Sun. The Sun's barycenter moves with respect to the planets, and one might assume birkland current related movementf stars in their orbit aound the galaxy. +-----+ Cool article. Says if earths magnetic field gets weaker core gets hotter. Wonder if that has anything to do with global warming? Tropics have gotten cooler and the north and south hemisphere warmer. Wonder if that's a heat transfer thing because distance from core to poles is less. https://researchoutreach.org/articles/earths-magnetic-field-changes-through-time/ Complex convection currents in the Earth’s core create a vast magnetic field around the Earth, protecting us from the charged solar particles that emanate from the Sun. However, the Earth’s magnetic field has not always been quite the same. Earth’s rocks provide a record of geomagnetic reversals and variations through time in the geomagnetic field. Dr Daniel Franco and his team at the National Observatory of Brazil use complex numerical models to better understand the structure of Earth’s magnetic field and what might cause these changes over geological timescales. >> Be careful! While not throwing it out, I am not a big fan of the conventional theory that the Earth's magnetic field is due to outer core movemennt although that might be a small component. Conventionally, the assumption is that short-term geoMag variations due to the Sun , whereas lnger term it is the mantle. To me, the data are more suggestive of sun only. >> The conventional model that a moving conductor (outer molten core of Earth), has BIG problems. Moving conductors don't generate electric current UNLESS thee moving with respect to a magnetic field, and magnetic fields don't generate electric current unless the magnetic fields change. Also, I saw a presentn by a materials specialist that suggested that the molten core may nt be liquid, that iron compounds at those conditions would be solid and have "extreme Poisson ratios", which attenuate shear forces. The conventional geoMag theory is based on the observed disappearance of the S-waves from large earthquakes, which is taken to prove a liquid state (outer molten core), but that may be flat wrong? >> The author of the article is completely unaware of any of this. # enddoc