#] #] ********************* #] "$d_Refs"'3_References quick reviews.txt' # www.BillHowell.ca 24Apr2024 initial # view in text editor, using constant-width font (eg courier), tabWidth = 3 #48************************************************48 #24************************24 # Table of Contents, generate with : # $ grep "^#]" "$d_Refs"'3_References quick reviews.txt' | sed "s|^#\]| |" # ********************* "$d_Refs"'3_References quick reviews.txt' 23Apr2024 [Rieger, Schwabe, Suess-de Vries]: The Sunny Beats of Resonance Big Coronal Hole, Solar Flares, They Don't Know Nova | S0 News Apr.22.2024 #24************************24 # Setup, ToDos, #08********08 #] ??May2024 #08********08 #] ??May2024 #08********08 #] ??May2024 #08********08 #] ??May2024 #08********08 #] ??May2024 #08********08 #] ??May2024 #08********08 #] ??May2024 #08********08 #] ??May2024 #08********08 #] ??May2024 #08********08 #] 05May2024 End of Einsteins Astronomy "$d_web"'My sports & clubs/natural- Suspicious/references/End of Einsteins Astronomy: Astronomical Origin for the Largest Marsquake Observed by InSight 05May2024 Alexander Safronov.pdf' +--+ https://hal.science/hal-04556936/ The End of Einstein's Astronomy: Astronomical Origin for the Largest Marsquake Observed by InSight Alexander N. Safronov (1) 1 IAP - A.M.Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics In this study, we investigated the planetary configuration of the Solar system at the moment of the largest marsquake s1222a observed by InSight. It is shown that the Solar system has a unique linear configuration formed by Saturn, Mars, Venus, and Mercury. Also it was also found that during the 1222a marsquake (3:50 LMST) Mars was turned in the direction of Jupiter. It has been suggested that the nature of this marsquake is the extrusion of gas through pingo chimneys or through cracks in the Martian crust (sips) under the influence of external gravitational forces. Additionally, 18 more cases of marsquakes were anayzed. It was found that during marsquakes, planetary parallelism often took place, in which the planets line up in pairs parallel to each other. It is assumed that possible sources of graviton may be not only planets, but also excited sites in the orbits of planets. It is shown that the excitation of the orbits of the planets is not arbitrary, but is determined by additional influence from other planets. It has been found that gravitons can move both from the overlying orbits to the underlying ones, and in the opposite direction. Several cases for the cascade transition of gravitons in a system of several orbits have been identified. These features do not fit into the standard picture of Einstein's theory of relativity. Up-to-date astronomy is like the sinking of the Titanic. "$d_web"'My sports & clubs/natural- Suspicious/references/End of Einsteins Astronomy: Astronomical Origin for the Largest Marsquake Observed by InSight 05May2024 Alexander Safronov.pdf' #08********08 #] 24Apr2024 [Rieger, Schwabe, Suess-de Vries]: The Sunny Beats of Resonance G.M. Horstmann, M. Klevs, G. Mamatsashvili, T. Weier 19Apr2024 "Rieger, Schwabe, Suess-de Vries: The Sunny Beats of Resonance" Solar Physics, v299, n51 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11207-024-02295-x >> Howell: I had all of this and far more 20 years ago with people who lived in math [Charvatova, Paul Vaughan, Timo Nimuro, probably Landscheit - but I didn't go far into his work]. Much later, Nicolas Scafetta and a very few others had insights, but nothing like the early guys. These stupid fucks still pkay with only 2 cards out of a deck of 52. /home/bill/web/My sports & clubs/natural- Suspicious/references/240419 [Rieger, Schwabe, Sess-de Vries] solar cycles, 5.9 mnth etc: Horstmann etal.pdf 11.07-year beat period of those magneto-Rossby waves 193-year Suess-de Vries cycle appears as an beat period between : 22.14-year Hale cycle 19.86-year a spin-orbit coupling effect related with the rosette-like motion of the Sun around the barycenter (Ivanka Charvatova?) Paul Vaughan!!! Schwabe cycle represents a clocked, if noisy, process with a mean period of 11.07 years, which is synchronized by the recurrence pattern of the triple syzygies of the tidally dominant planets Venus, Earth, and Jupiter "... Therefore, although neither the temporal nor the azimuthal dependence of the observations gives perfect evidence for tidally triggered magneto-Rossby waves, they both entail sufficient indications that may justify further data analysis to check this hypothesis. Another feature to be shortly mentioned here is the appearance of longer periods such as 1.3 years (Howe et al., 2000) or 1.7 years (Korsós et al., 2023), which both are definitely beyond the range of excitability of retrograde magneto-Rossby waves as discussed above. In this respect, it seems worthwhile to consider the possibility of intervening nonlinearities, e.g., tachocline nonlinear oscillations (Dikpati et al., 2018, 2021a). Two types of such nonlinear wave couplings were recently studied in detail by Raphaldini et al. (2019, 2022). In either case, they involve quadratic interactions between the waves, which might lead to various frequency and wavenumber resonances. With respect to the latter, we point to the analysis of Bilenko (2020), who showed the occurrence of dominant m = 4 modes at the solar maximum, connected with strong equatorially symmetric m = 0 modes (Bilenko’s Figure 4d,e). Obviously, such a combination of m = 4 and m = 0 modes is exactly what would be expected from a quadratic interaction of the tidally triggered m = 2 modes as considered so far. Although we refrain here from a detailed computation of the full spatio-temporal struc- ture of those nonlinear terms (e.g., in equation systems (25) – (27) or (28) – (32) of Raphal- dini et al., 2019), we restrict our attention to the temporal dependence of the square of the sum of three sine-functions, representing different magneto-Rossby waves, (3) s(t) = { sum[i=[VJ, EJ, VE]: cos(4*π*(t − t_i)/Pi) }^2 ..." p10h0.95 "... Apart from some more exotic models relying on changed rates of nuclear fusion in the Sun’s core (Wolff and Patrone, 2010; Scafetta, 2012), there are basically four mechanisms that seem suitable to provide a discernible effect on the dynamo. 1. The first one assumes that the ellipticity of the Sun’s barycentric motion leads to periodic changes of its differential rotation (Zaqarashvili, 1997).3 >> Howell: synchronous [rotation, revolution, etc] has long led me to sduspect this 2. The second one relies on the high sensitivity of the field storage capacity within the weakly subadiabatic tachocline, which might easily react even to weak (pressure) disturbances by releasing more or less magnetic flux tubes for its rise to the Sun’s surface. This concept, originally introduced by Abreu et al. (2012) (based on Ferriz Mas, Schmitt, and Schüssler, 1994), was recently tested in a 2D Babcock–Leighton variant of a synchronized dynamo model by Charbonneau (2022) (relying on the time-delay concept of Wilmot-Smith et al., 2006). Exhibiting the same type of parametric resonance as previously observed by Stefani, Giesecke, and Weier (2019), this promising result superseded the skeptical judgment of the synchronization suitability of Babcock–Leighton-type models that was based on an evidently too simple 1D model of Stefani et al. (2018). 3. A third potential mechanism for dynamo synchronization had emerged with the observation that the kink-type, current-driven Tayler instability (TI) (Tayler, 1973; Seilmayer et al., 2012) is prone to intrinsic helicity oscillations (Weber et al., 2013, 2015), at least for small magnetic Prandtl numbers (which applies to the tachocline). While it was first identified in the simplified setting of TI in a nonrotating full cylinder, a similar oscillatory behavior was recently shown to also appear in a much more realistic 3D-model of the tachocline (Figure 16 in Monteiro et al., 2023). A key observation of Stefani et al. (2016) was then that those helicity oscillations of the TI (with its azimuthal wave number m = 1) are sensitive to entrainment by tide-like (m = 2) perturbations. For the not dissimilar case of an m = 1 Large Scale Circulation in a Rayleigh–Bénard convection problem, this concept of helicity synchronization by tide-like forcing was recently exemplified in a liquid metal experiment (Jüstel et al., 2020, 2022). 4. Slightly modifying the concept of directly forced helicity synchronization, we focus here on the fourth possibility that the (tidally triggered) magneto-Rossby waves themselves give rise to an α-effect, a possibility that was first studied by Avalos-Zuñiga, Plunian, and Rädler (2009). While the α-effect for stationary Rossby waves is typically zero (due to the 90◦ shift of vertical velocity and vorticity) these authors found a non-vanishing α-effect for the case of drifting waves. This is indeed the scenario we are dealing with in this paper, and it remains to be seen how much of the α-effect is entailed in the superposition of the three magneto-Rossby waves as excited by the two-planet spring tides discussed above. ..." >> Howell: BULLSHIT zero attempt to model with electro-magnetism, plasma. They may be stuck in gravity-only think, in spite of their rhetoric. All of this could be experimentally shown by something like the SAFIRE experiment? Why are we wasting time with fuckup [theory, model, analysts]s? Will we never learn? p14h0.85 "... A closely related question refers to the observation of Reinhold et al. (2020) that the Sun’s activity appears to show a significantly lower variability than otherRieger, Schwabe, Suess-de Vries: The Sunny Beats of Resonance stars with near-solar temperatures and rotation periods. In this regard, given some interesting applications in other fields (Pontin et al., 2014), it is not unlikely that this lower variability, or noise level, indeed results from parametric resonance. 6 ..." p15h0.2 "... More recently still, Charbonneau (2022) put into question the entire approach of linking long-term cycles with correspondingly long periodicities of the planetary system by arguing that “(b)ecause the low frequency response is internal to the dynamo itself, it is similar for incoherent stochastic forcing and coherent external periodic forcing”. This led him to the conclusions “that if external forcing of the solar dynamo of any origin is responsible for the centennial and millennial modulations of the magnetic activity cycle, the required forcing amplitudes should be well beyond the homeopathic regime in order to produce a detectable signature in the presence of other sources of modulation, whether deterministic or stochastic.” ..." >> Howell: BULSHIT!!! 2 cards out of a deck of 52 again, MHD-types without plasmas: fucking hilarious. Paul Vaughan went far beyond any of these jokers with no [fund, salary, teams of [tech, sci] support]. p17h0.6 "... The results of the simulation for the particular case epsilon = 0.9583 are shown in Figure 10. We stick here to the simplified Schwabe period T f = 11.00 years, as in Klevs, Stefani, and Jouve (2023) and use accordingly a slightly modified value T B = 19.82 years of the barycentric period to obtain also a simplified beat period of 11.00 × 19.82/(19.82 − 11) = 200 years. We see that this beat period of 200 years indeed shows up in all field components, mea- sured here at r = 0.7. We can identify, in particular, a clear Gnevyshev–Ohl rule (Gnevyshev and Ohl, 1948) in terms of a succession of weak and strong cycles, which is changing its order every 200 years, as also observed for the solar cycle by Tlatov (2013). 7 Note, however, that for the particular model as chosen here, such a clear behavior occurs only in a not too broad range of epsilon and that more complicated behaviors are observed for other values. A more detailed investigation of the corresponding parameter dependencies, as well as the implementation of all planets in the angular momentum term, must be left for future studies. ..." p51h0.0 "... 6. Bray–Hallstatt? Usually, solar activity variations with time scales of 1 – 3 kyr are discussed under the names of Eddy and Bray–Hallstatt cycles (Steinhilber et al., 2012; Abreu et al., 2012; Soon et al., 2014; Scafetta et al., 2016; Usoskin et al., 2016). However, it is by far not obvious whether the very concept of “cycles” can be transferred at all from the decadal (Schwabe, Hale) and centennial (Gleissberg, Suess-de Vries) to the millennial time scale. 8 In this context, the analysis of certain ice drift proxies by Bond et al. (1997, 1999) had provided evidence for millennial climate variability to occur in certain 1 – 3 kyr “cycles” of abrupt changes of the North Atlantic’s surface hydrography, which are closely related to the corresponding grand minima of the solar dynamo (Bond et al., 2001). ..." #08********08 #] 24Apr2024 Satoshi Okamoto etal 11Jan2021 "superflares on solar-type stars" Satoshi Okamoto etal 11Jan2021 "Statistical properties of superflares on solar-type stars: results using all the Kepler primary mission data" https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/abc8f5 Dynamics - great paper in a long series by multiple teams that derive Solar system periodicities from other stars: ~1.5 ky Dansgaard-Oeschger (DO) event X200 flares ~6 ky Heinrich event (HE) X1000 flares on other stars (Heinrich-Bond) 12 ky Pole shift micronova I think mostly data Milky Way stars, but possibly some from other galaxies? (I haven't properly checked 5-6 papers to see). "$d_web"'My sports & clubs/natural- Suspicious/references/starFlare- superflares on solar-type stars: Kepler primary mission data 11Jan2021 Okamoto etal.pdf' #08********08 #] 23Apr2024 emto Steven Wickson: our [past, present, future] from the stars? Many nice papers have been emerging recently, politically-incorrect and long-hated by the great majority of [climate, astronomy, physics] experts (even considering huge changes in perception of the last 10-15 years, but in small minorities or scientists). Here are two of legions : G.M. Horstmann, M. Klevs, G. Mamatsashvili, T. Weier 19Apr2024 "Rieger, Schwabe, Suess-de Vries: The Sunny Beats of Resonance" Solar Physics, v299, n51 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11207-024-02295-x This is really fun for me, having participated in discussions with Paul Charbonneau of UQuebec at Montreal (?I can't remember, maybe Polytechnique?). I love his paper about the perenniel failures of planetary models of the sunspot and other solar cycles, dating back just after the sunspot cycle was identified. I need this "standard religion of science" for my self-imposed practice of "multiple conflicting hypothesis", but even more importantly as a perfect example of the normal intellectual failures of scientific experts (in this case the critics of planetary influence, who have only "Universal Function Approximators", which render irrelevant their [concept, model]s. They have always been unwittingly playing bridge with 2 cards out a deck of 52 (in this case in [physics, astronomy, geology]). Satoshi Okamoto etal 11Jan2021 "Statistical properties of superflares on solar-type stars: results using all the Kepler primary mission data" https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/abc8f5 Dynamics - great paper in a long series by multiple teams that derive Solar system periodicities from other stars: ~1.5 ky Dansgaard-Oeschger (DO) event X200 flares ~6 ky Heinrich event (HE) X1000 flares on other stars (Heinrich-Bond) 12 ky Pole shift micronova I think mostly data Milky Way stars, but possibly some from other galaxies? (I haven't properly checked 5-6 papers to see). "$d_web"'My sports & clubs/natural- Suspicious/references/starFlare- superflares on solar-type stars: Kepler primary mission data 11Jan2021 Okamoto etal.pdf' I haven't found anyone, on blogs or in person, who shows any signs of [understand, extend]ing the significance of proxies of our solar system's "past-present-future" derived statistically (probably not very reliably) from the behaviours of large populations of other stars. An independent estimate of our own local behaviours (actually literally, if you follow that track of associations), that is COMPLETELY independent of what happens locally. Reminds me of Isaac Asimov's "Foundation and Empire" (that, plus "Nightfall" are his only books that fascinated me. Definitely not my favourite sci-fi author, partly because I don't have favorites.) Keep in mid that there has been strong work on the recent "disruptions in progressive proximity" of the 3-4 nearest starts to our Sun looking in the general direction of the center of the Milky Way. Strong progressive changes on our Solar System [planet, moon]s in the last 10 years are being monitored closely. +-----+ #] Big Coronal Hole, Solar Flares, They Don't Know Nova | S0 News Apr.22.2024 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=in3oewSrKQw TODAY'S LINKS: No Magnetic braking: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2404.12525.pdf Many Solar Cycles: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11207-024-02295-x G.M. Horstmann, M. Klevs, G. Mamatsashvili, T. Weier 19Apr2024 "Rieger, Schwabe, Suess-de Vries: The Sunny Beats of Resonance" Solar Physics, v299, n51 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11207-024-02295-x /home/bill/web/My sports & clubs/natural- Suspicious/references/240419 [Rieger, Schwabe, Sess-de Vries] solar cycles, 5.9 mnth etc: Horstmann etal.pdf 11.07-year beat period of those magneto-Rossby waves 193-year Suess-de Vries cycle appears as an beat period between : 22.14-year Hale cycle 19.86-year a spin-orbit coupling effect related with the rosette-like motion of the Sun around the barycenter (Ivanka Charvatova?) # enddoc