/home/bill/Projects/NPA - physics/140125 NPA James Cook - quantum fluctuations.txt "Applying the Riemann Statistical Oscillation to Vacuum Fluctuation" by Jeffrey Cook. www.k1man.com/Cook140125A.pdf !!! the Specific Trajectory hypothesis !!! greatest common divider (gcd) to deterine period (like Paul Vaughan!) ***************************** Howell's comments : Barry Setterfield (zero point energy thinking) has commented that h*c is constant, but not h nor c. H brought out historical work that c has changed after 300 years. Does the gcd of polynomials and the modulo of wave functions relate to work in encyption/decryption field (like primes), and can therefore benefit from results that area? >>>>Alex Petty3 to Everyone: if you know how rsa's original asymmetric cryptographic system works, it sounds as though jeff's function might bear upon the strength of that algorithm. In order to view the videos, I'll have to get a 64-bit computer in order to install Fuze Meeting on my Linux system. The zoom has been focussed-in so that it cuts off much of the slide (for me). I can't seem to zoom out the view for me. Alex Petty3 to Everyone: expand your screen bill. Alex Petty3 to Everyone: use zoom at the top right also. Thanks, Alex. I might be limited by my screen resolution on my laptop. This webcast was a pileof fun! Great work, Jeff. **************************** Others comments that caught my eye Glenn Baxter to Everyone: His paper can be found at www.k1man.com/Cook140125A.pdf Alex Petty3 to Everyone: http://www.alexpetty.com/index.php/2011/05/20/long-division-and-euclids-lemma/ Alex Petty3 to Everyone: if you know how rsa's original asymmetric cryptographic system works, it sounds as though jeff's function might bear upon the strength of that algorithm. george james ducas to Everyone: you need to know the equivalence between proper and sclar funtions Lou LaFollette to Everyone: This may be the answer to my question, "What drives the formation of structure." ph_comment Bill Lucas - together with >Dave Birkman? we developed a model of eklectron orbitals around atom. John Wsol to Everyone: Essentially this also ties in the "meaning" of the Fine-Structure constant. ph_comment Ed Dowdye - Russian expt on space station - momemtum of spinning "boat"? when left shaft - OK for a bit, then sudden change that violates conservation of momentum. p_comment Jeff Cook - get a ?gyro-ball? and see how it works ph_comment Greg Volk - Stephen Hawking now says black holes don't exist!! **************************** Full chat stream george james ducas to Everyone: multiplication is asuingle system george james ducas to Everyone: single george james ducas to Everyone: additive is relative george james ducas to Everyone: multiplicatio is a single inertial system george james ducas to Everyone: additive is multiple george james ducas to Everyone: there is no unceertainty george james ducas to Everyone: multiplication is the wrong philosophy of math george james ducas to Everyone: you need adidtive to do away with uncertainty Alex Petty3 to Everyone: multiplication adds dimension, division (the inverse) removes dimension. (spatial dimension in a physical system) george james ducas to Everyone: \everything is time depedent baunes to Everyone: there are many different interpretations of (+,x,-,/). george james ducas to Everyone: time and velocity baunes to Everyone: They can be viewed in many different ways. george james ducas to Everyone: phi X phihat = -1 is velocity x time = -D george james ducas to Everyone: 2 pi is the fine structure constant Alex Petty3 to Everyone: the vibration at very high frequency is so rapid as to cross the non-linear boundry george james ducas to Everyone: you can know Howell, Bill - Alberta to Everyone: Barry Setterfield (zero point energy thinking) has commented that h*c is constant, but not h nor c. H brought out historical work that c has changed ofver 300 years. Franklin Hu to Everyone: Really, you can keep a gyroscope going by just twisting around? Alex Petty3 to Everyone: video not visible to the presentation baunes to Everyone: cant see it Alex Petty3 to Everyone: (right not playing) baunes to Everyone: doenst play Michael Shea to Everyone: You have to press play on the screen yourself Glenn Baxter to Everyone: Not here. Ian Cowan to Everyone: visible but not moving baunes to Everyone: youtube link? John Wsol to Everyone: I hit play! Bill Lucas to Everyone: Everyone needs to click on video Alex Petty3 to Everyone: ahh yes Michael Anteski to Everyone: Is precession the same as induction of an apogee by incremental additionsto the orbital? Alex Petty3 to Everyone: thats it Alex Petty3 to Everyone: 3 2 1 Franklin Hu to Everyone: We dont' have a play button John Wsol to Everyone: Mine is playing... Alex Petty3 to Everyone: its playing. hover over video thumbnail. Alex Petty3 to Everyone: then press play.. Michael Shea to Everyone: Move cursor to screen to see play button Franklin Hu to Everyone: Got it, you have to roll over the video Roger P to Everyone: I'm viewing on an iPad and it doesn't play. There is no play button. Alex Petty3 to Everyone: done. OUR PAL Asija to Everyone: What's the name or link of the video. I joined a little late. Ian Cowan to Everyone: neepers dr to Everyone: aka telegraphers equation?? Glenn Baxter to Everyone: His paper can be found at www.k1man.com/Cook140125A.pdf george james ducas to Everyone: phi and phihat Alex Petty3 to Everyone: http://www.alexpetty.com/index.php/2011/05/20/long-division-and-euclids-lemma/ Howell, Bill - Alberta to Everyone: Does the gcd of polynomials and the modulo of wave functions relate to work in encyption/decryption field (like primes), and can therefore benefit from results that area? Alex Petty3 to Everyone: if you know how rsa's original asymmetric cryptographic system works, it sounds as though jeff's function might bear upon the strength of that algorithm. george james ducas to Everyone: you need to know the equivalence between proper and sclar funtions Glenn Baxter to Everyone: Very interesting presentation! Glenn Baxter to Everyone: What is that subastance? Glenn Baxter to Everyone: substance John Wsol to Everyone: Sounds like Our PAL Howell, Bill - Alberta to Everyone: In order to view the videos, I'll have to get a 64-bit computer in order to install Fuze Meeting on my Linux system. Alex Petty3 to Everyone: right at the peak point of interest of the demo! John Wsol to Everyone: Charlie? Alex Petty3 to Everyone: cant hear jeff at all Alex Petty3 to Everyone: all objects are waves, because everything is light. Howell, Bill - Alberta to Everyone: The zoom has been focussed-in so that it cuts off much of the slide (for me). I can't seem to zoom out the view for me. Alex Petty3 to Everyone: expand your screen bill. Alex Petty3 to Everyone: use zoom at the top right also. Alex Petty3 to Everyone: well done jeff (as always) Alex Petty3 to Everyone: loved it. Howell, Bill - Alberta to Everyone: Thanks, Alex. I might be limited by my screen resolution on my laptop. Lou LaFollette to Everyone: This may be the answer to my question, "What drives the formation of structure." Alex Petty3 to Everyone: the self organizing attractions and replusions of magnetism drive the formation of structure i would say, Lou LaFollette to Everyone: Thanks, Alex Michael Anteski to Everyone: Organizing forces have to be uniform and elemental John Wsol to Everyone: RE: Real+imanginary -- I think of the imaginary part being a measure of the stress-energy tensor of the Space-Medium. I invite comments on this iday. John Wsol to Everyone: idea Alex Petty3 to Everyone: neodymnium Alex Petty3 to Everyone: rare earth John Wsol to Everyone: Element 41 Alex Petty3 to Everyone: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neodymium Alex Petty3 to Everyone: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neodymium Alex Petty3 to Everyone: (Jeff does have that gift) John Wsol to Everyone: Opps. 41=Niobium 60=Neodymium george james ducas to Everyone: charge refers to structure george james ducas to Everyone: structure precedds velicty and function george james ducas to Everyone: +0 nd -) george james ducas to Everyone: +0 and -0 Alex Petty3 to Everyone: uncertainty is an intrinsic part of conciousness itself. tough to bottle and sell george james ducas to Everyone: when the seperate additive system are equivalent to the entire multiplicative system, you have the conservation of energy John Wsol to Everyone: Bill Lucas: Over the last week I have been working on answering your question about the magnitude of fundamental charge (e) as the magnitude of the Space-Now Manifold as being contained within the context of the Planck-charge. Where Planck-Charge is the amplitude of the 4D spherical standing wave that constructs the quantum geometry of the context in which we experience space-time. george james ducas to Everyone: however, time is icluded John Wsol to Everyone: Essentially this also ties in the "meaning" of the Fine-Structure constant. george james ducas to Everyone: uncertainty in not a reality baunes to Everyone: In probablility theory, it is shown that a random varible times its "expectation" is always 1. baunes to Everyone: Applying this to x=position with an uncertainty delta_x, its "expectation" is its derivative. The multiplication of these two is 1. baunes to Everyone: IOW, the more you know x, the less you know its derivative (sped or momentum) Michael Anteski to Everyone: Is "recession" the same as incremental additons summating (not blipping) into an orbital apogee? John Wsol to Everyone: The "frame-rate" of the video may be distoring our perception of the direction of rotation. We can only preceive a series of still images. Michael Anteski to Everyone: "precession" george james ducas to Everyone: caused by the wrong philosophy of math george james ducas to Everyone: there is no uncertainty george james ducas to Everyone: uncertainty is caused by the wrong mathematical axoims baunes to Everyone: george. Are you sure? george james ducas to Everyone: yes baunes to Everyone: Uncertainty is inherent in the limits of our measuring devices. george james ducas to Everyone: emergent systems are all predictable baunes to Everyone: Uncertainty is inherent in the limits of our measuring devices. george james ducas to Everyone: emergent systems are all predictable baunes to Everyone: predictable<>uniqueness george james ducas to Everyone: you are not perfect but the math is george james ducas to Everyone: and its use baunes to Everyone: And btw, *some* emergent systems are predictable. Not all are predictable. george james ducas to Everyone: all are predictable baunes to Everyone: Nope. george james ducas to Everyone: you just havent got the right equation John Wsol to Everyone: Photon = h * c (increments of angular momentum of the propogating wavefunction) baunes to Everyone: perhaps it depends on what is meant by 'prdictble'. george james ducas to Everyone: you need the right mathematics baunes to Everyone: is the random function predictable? george james ducas to Everyone: dont blame you lack of knowledge as a scince baunes to Everyone: I am the greatest scientist around. Since you are not, you cant realize this! george james ducas to Everyone: you blame you lack of understanding as scince george james ducas to Everyone: nonsense baunes to Everyone: Is the random function predictable? george james ducas to Everyone: the unverse is not random george james ducas to Everyone: wrong axiom george james ducas to Everyone: only life is random baunes to Everyone: answer the question george james ducas to Everyone: i did baunes to Everyone: is the random function predictabl? baunes to Everyone: no, you changed the subject george james ducas to Everyone: there is no random function, you have misinterpreted the situation Lou LaFollette to Everyone: Thanks, Jeff. Great presentation. george james ducas to Everyone: find the equation that eliminates your random understanding baunes to Everyone: there is no situation. I simply asked in a tttttoaly independnt way, is the random function predictable? george james ducas to Everyone: thats what this presentation is about george james ducas to Everyone: elimiae the random george james ducas to Everyone: eliminate baunes to Everyone: Again, you are changing the subject. Typical. Dont quit your night job! Jaythree to Everyone: Someday I'd like to hear this extented into the topic of emergent properties. Great presentation. Great presentation. Lou LaFollette to Everyone: I second that Jaythree Alex Petty3 to Everyone: note, multiplation is an operation which poses two values at each other at 90 degrees (pi/2) baunes to Everyone: You can to the sme pics in MS Word Howell, Bill - Alberta to Everyone: This webcast was a pileof fun! Great work, Jeff. Glenn Baxter to Everyone: Good job Jeff! Alex Petty3 to Everyone: thanks jeff. take care. Alex Petty3 to Everyone: wow, next youll be telling ronald mcdonald doesnt believe in big macs Dionysios G. Raftopoulos to Everyone: Thanks Jeff and Greg enddoc