| 07:40 | "How come these geologists keep forgetting that water can't flow uphill?" |
| 08:12 | "... sedimentation layering does not require formation in a basin with running water. The electrical model provides a far simpler solution that no-one over at Big Space seems to want to consider." |
| 08:22 |
"Case in point: we know material removed electrically is going to land somewhere,
and in the case of Mars that material might be the rubble covering the entire Northern hemisphere of the planet. Meanwhile, the Southern hemisphere has been machined down almost 5km. leaving behind a much smoother surface pockmarked in vast numbers of craters, all angled at 90 degrees, just like a piece of sheet metal machined with an arc." (Howell: fractal patterns of right geometry - as per Paul Anderson's EU conference papers) |
| 09:53 | "NASA and The SETI Institute have set up a base camp in Devon Island, Nunavut territory in the Canadian high Arctic for the study of the Haughton impact crater and its surroundings. They call it the Haughton Mars project because the unexplored island is considered a Mars analog. ... Trouble is they lump in a bunch of unusual characteristics that can't be explained by water erosion : " |
| 10:46 |
"1. the valleys are spaced apart, with large dissected areas between valleys 2. the valleys display open, branching patterns with large undissected areas between the branches 3. branches often have ill-defined sources but mature in width and depth over sdhort distances relative to the size of the network 4. branches maintain relatively constant width and depth over long distances 5. branches split and rejoin to form steep-walled islands 6. branches have V-shaped walls and flat floors 7. channels on valley floors are absent or poorly expressed. Their scale also varies over an order of magnitude In other words, all the same features we already talked about on Valles Marineris and the Grand Canyon. It even has a nearby crater." |
| 12:01 |
"Now unless we want to pull a new cause out of the hat for every canyon - no matter if they all share the same obviously electrical and laboratory reproducible features - then we're going to find our scientists growing stranger and more confusing by the day. And prediction will become just about impossible, which is exactly where we are with the Standard Model, and that leads me to a question. What if we've been studying the physics of an incorrect majpr premise since the fay scientists assume that charged particles acclelerating from the Sun were somehow not an electrical current, despite what Ralph Jeurgens tried to tell them?" (Howell: Hans Alfen as well). What if the idea that space is held together by gravity was a mistake?" |
| 13:00 |
"Now the debunkers will (Howell: Don Scott is an electrical engineer, not a [General Relativity, Quantum mechanics] physicist, which may be why he is so much smarter than essentially all of the mainstream? <grin>) |